Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dan's avatar

I’m not disagreeing with anything said here and have read these arguments in many other forums. What’s not said or acknowledged in this and similar things I’ve seen is the fact that not everyone is in a position financially to hire a fitness coach or trainer. I’ve worked with trainer before. It’s been enormously helpful and if I could right now I would hire another one in a heartbeat. It’s not feasible for me at this time. Nor is a nutritionist or a life coach. So if an AI “coach” can provide me with helpful information and suggestions for ways to improve my health and fitness I’m going to take advantage of that option and the actual human coach I’m not able to hire right now is not losing his job as a result of it.

Expand full comment
Adam Zucker's avatar

Like you said, AI can be good as an assistant, but it fails when used as a teaching tool. First and foremost, it cannot replace the social and emotional connection that a teacher and coach bring to the classroom/gym. Additionally, like you mentioned, AI relies on data sets, so it's not providing us the full wealth of knowledge and experience that a good teacher/coach has.

I haven't used AI for anything other than playful image generation, but I understand how it can benefit those of us in a field who know what we're doing, but need a little help with time management and task delegation. It's probably good for creating outlines of lesson/exercise plans, that we as professionals can then go in and tailor with our human-centered experience.

Nice food for thought in this post!

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts